Meghan Markle is being criticized by Megyn Kelly as Princess Catherine takes the spotlight. “She’s not in a good place!”

In a surprising turn of events that has reignited longstanding debates surrounding celebrity, privilege, and humanitarianism, Meghan Markle faces sharp criticism from outspoken commentators including Megyn Kelly, who has boldly declared that Markle is “not a well person.” This scathing remark comes as Delaware’s duo, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, prepare to accept a so-called “humanitarian of the year” award despite the deepening turbulence surrounding Prince Harry’s African parks charity, which has been marred by accusations of mismanagement and controversy.

The Sussexes’ planned appearance in New York City coincides with a critical moment; as reports surface detailing the collapse of Prince Harry’s African Parks charity, the New York Times has pivoted from being a supportive ally to joining in the chorus of condemnation against Harry and Meghan’s humanitarian claims. The timing could not be more significant; on this same day, former President Donald Trump appears to have made strides towards establishing a fragile peace in a tumultuous world, leaving the Sussexes’ self-claimed accolades in stark contrast.

Meghan Markle, who recently documented her visit to the site of Princess Diana’s tragic death in a frivolous post showcasing her bare feet crisscrossed in the vehicle, has triggered outrage for what many perceive to be a tactless promotional stunt. In a video that went viral, Markle, while en route to a high-profile fashion event in Paris, highlighted the very location of her children’s grandmother’s untimely demise—an act that commentators argue was not merely ill-timed but symbolically disrespectful.

Kelly’s remarks encapsulate the prevailing sentiment among critics who pit the couple’s alleged humanitarian efforts against their luxurious lifestyle. “It’s as if they are living in an alternate reality, where their every whim is suffocated under the weight of their own delusions. They are the textbook definition of grifters, cashing in on their royal titles while the world burns,” she criticized. This vigorous dissection of their motives raises questions about the authenticity of their claims to philanthropic sincerity.

To add salt to the wound, Harry’s latest endeavor to champion African wildlife conservation has come under fire as the government of Chad severed ties with his foundation, citing a “disrespectful attitude” and “lack of investment.” This unprecedented fallout has left Harry scrambling for credibility at a time when he is supposed to be basking in accolades. As criticism mounts, it is evident that Harry’s dedication to African charity is being questioned in a way it never has before.

Onlookers and critics alike note a troubling trend: the Sussexes continue to tout a narrative of social responsibility while their actions suggest otherwise. Megan Kelly, alongside various pundits, has homed in on the stark contradictions between the couple’s public personas and the realities of their charitable endeavors. Meghan’s social media antics – showcasing glamorous lifestyles while paradoxically claiming empathy for global challenges – have drawn parallels to celebrity culture’s most notorious faux pas.

The implications of this public scrutiny are vast and far-reaching. As the Sussexes prepare for an award ceremony amidst dwindling support, insiders speculate that their humanitarian goals are more self-serving than philanthropic. Critics are quick to highlight that while Harry aims to gain humanitarian recognition, he seems increasingly out of touch with the complicated realities of the organizations he purports to support. Amid the fallout, questions surrounding his commitment to genuine causes persist, leading some to label him as a “disaster area” in charitable pursuits.

In a steely yet resonant essay penned by Catherine, Princess of Wales, the notion of genuine connection within families stands in stark contrast to Meghan’s empty gestures; Katherine emphasizes the importance of investing time in relationships as a counter to the growing epidemic of disconnection fueled by technology and distraction. This hour-long, replete with heartfelt appeals, reinforces the royal family’s traditional values of compassion and personal connection, drawing a clear line between those who earnestly strive for social good and the Sussexes.

While the world watches the unfolding drama, the stark contrasts between the royal family and the Sussexes are coming to a head. Catherine’s focus on connectivity highlights a deeper issue as Harry and Meghan’s narratives continue to falter, legitimizing the concerns raised about their purported humanitarianism. As the cultural conversation evolves, the Sussexes’ attempts to reclaim their narrative amid mounting criticism may only lead to further disenchantment.

This is not merely an eccentric social media moment or a mischievous headline. What we are witnessing is a potential unraveling of the Sussexes’ carefully constructed image as compassionate global citizens. With their humanitarian reputation teetering on a precipice and public scrutiny sharpening every criticism aimed at them, it remains unclear how much longer they can uphold their facade without addressing the overwhelming evidence stacked against them.

As the reactions flood in—appalled, amused, and incredulous—the question remains: Can the Duke and Duchess of Sussex survive this public backlash and salvage their tarnished reputation? With these powerful developments unfolding in New York City, it’s clear that the discourse surrounding Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s humanitarian relevance will be front and center for the foreseeable future. The world shifts, and so do the allegiances; it’s an unfolding saga no one can afford to ignore. As Harry and Meghan prepare to be awarded, all eyes will be watching keenly to see just what they really intend to achieve, and whether their efforts will be met with applause or scorn.